Attitude, Business, Investments, Finance, Inspirational, Leadership, Mindset, Network Marketing, Travel, Photography, Books

4 Comments Already

commenter
Hai Liang Said,
July 2nd, 2008 @10:51 am  

Hi Ronald,

This sounds a bit one sided report. The links above quote from similar sources with no real evidence of Roger being found guilty of a scammer after being investigated by authorities.

In S’pore if 40 people can really hold a protest, they would all be fined or jailed. So it’s quite unbelievable. If the members in S’pore are really being duped, then it is very easy for them to get back their membership fee since S’pore is extremely strict and come down hard on businesses being claimed as a scam and reported in the Straits Times or New Paper.

As far as I know, many successful people tend to be target of smear and litigation because of jealousy and disgrunt. What is the easier way, work or sue for money?

Unless we have concrete evidence from the courts that the business is a scam, we should judge a person is guilty until proven.

Thanks for the post, at least is a good thing that we learn the campaign against Roger. But we must also take things with a pinch of salt and base on evidence and not how we feel.

Please continue to post such things so we can learn more!

commenter
Peter Green Said,
July 4th, 2008 @7:06 pm  

Nov 25, 2006 - The Straits Times, Singapore

Unhappy with business network club, These members demand their money back. 40 out of 69 vexed members gather outside club premises

By Tanya Fong

DISGRUNTLED MEMBERS: More than 40 life members of XL Results Foundation outside its Cecil Street office yesterday, including a 13-year-old Singapore boy (second from left in the foreground) representing his doctor father. — MUGILAN RAJASEGERAN

THEY saw it as a no-risk investment - a way to expand their business contacts and perhaps make some money.

Instead, 40 individuals who bought life membership in an exclusive business networking club gathered outside the office of XL Results Foundation yesterday to demand their money back.

They are part of a group of 69 disgruntled members who claim they were duped by the company’s director, millionaire consultant and author Roger Hamilton, who they said promised them the company would buy back their membership at the same price, or at market value.

Instead, members who had bought into the club in order to sell their membership for a profit claimed they were unable to do so. The company, they said, also did not come through on its promise to help them resell their membership.

Although prices increased from US$3,200 in 2003 to about US$8,000 (S$12,400) today, 36-year-old Mr Lai Kum Loon, managing director of a car parts company, said: ‘When I wanted to transfer my membership, I was told I had to find my own buyer.’

What is more, members also said they did not get access to the large network of business connections the company promised them.

Among the crowd outside the XL Results office yesterday were five Britons, a Malaysian who came all the way from Malacca and a 13-year-old Singapore boy representing his doctor father, who was at work.

They all wanted to withdraw their membership from the four-year-old operation, which was known formerly Competitive Edge.

The total value of these memberships is about $460,000, more than twice XL Results’ reported net profit of $207,612 for the 2005-2006 financial year.

One Singaporean member, Miss Sarah Kong, complained: ‘They simply did not provide the contacts of the other members, or those from other countries.’

The club currently has more than 300 life members in Singapore, and about 900 others in 15 other countries.

Membership includes access to the company’s training and mentoring workshops in South-east Asia, subscription to its monthly XL Magazine, as well as use of its worldwide networking website.

The complaining members may be on sticky ground, however. Copies of the life membership contracts seen by The Straits Times do not state that the company will buy back life memberships or help find buyers.

Nor is there any clause that says life members have to find their own buyers.

Mr Hamilton, 38, a Briton who is a Singapore permanent resident, is currently in New Zealand on a business trip.

The millionaire, wealth consultant and author of local bestseller Wink And Grow Rich, told The Straits Times on the telephone: ‘Today’s visit was a press stunt by a group, many are not our members.

‘We are looking into this matter. Any member who has concerns can come directly to us and we will look into their request for a transfer and facilitate it.’

commenter
July 4th, 2008 @7:44 pm  

Hi Hai Liang

You are right, there are two side of the story. What we can do at the very least is to learn from this as there are always other scams around and we do not really know which one at the first glance. Just be extra careful.

commenter
consumer watch Said,
July 4th, 2008 @8:33 pm  

Pyramid schemes and scams are created to deceive and dupe. They can take years to expose. They are eventually exposed because of the community, media and authorities. Being prosecuted in one country does not stop someone scamming in another country. Con men use all forms of trickery to get around the law. But with the world wide web a paper trial follows them:

Non disclosure to XL Results Foundation Members - Fraudulent Business - Roger Hamilton and the XL Scam

XL Results Foundation is promoted by Mr Daniel Priestley of Triumphant Events in the United Kingdom, St John’s House, St John’s Square London.

http://www.triumphantevents.com

http://www.triumphantevents.com.au/images/annexure-a-document.pdf?PHPSESSID=c3bcdd5455dc3b2148b047b8fa22a502

In June 2007 the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) commenced legal action against The Triumphant Group Pty Ltd (trading as Triumphant Events) for alleged contraventions of the Trade Practices Act 1974.

The Federal Court of Australia has declared by consent that Triumphant, by engaging in the above conduct, contravened the Act. The Court also made orders by consent restraining Triumphant from engaging in the offending conduct in the future.

Related Post

Please Leave Your Comments Below

Please Note: All comments will be moderated


Comments links could be nofollow free.